Rabu, 09 Oktober 2013

EVAN RAHANDA  “ as SECOND SPEAKER”
ENGLISH DEBATE
NEGATIVE TEAM
TEAM 16st (RIFGIN RIGAZY and NUGROHO PERMATA PUTRA)
 “THIS HOUSE WOULD ALLOW STUDENT TO BRINGING MOBILEPHONE TO SCHOOL”

Nowaday, we always hear that using mobilephone to school is supported to all of student to face technologies developed, but we think that statement is be able to make student buy a newest mobile phone and gadget, and then will be make another student which cannot buy gadget or mobile phone will be underestimated, it’s not good for education.  In emergency situation, while the student in a conflict area like a kidnaped, and the student not bring their own mobilephone, they can scream to everyone, that’s more effective than they must to call someone, and attach message to someone, and also it wasting time for us. if it happened in the school, that was teacher resposibilty.

Using Mobile Phone for education  like read digibook, its will make student didn’t want to go to the library and then will make our culture disappear. In this motion I have education point of view why we refuse allow student bring mobilephone to school, because in learning process, student have to consentration to get a knowledge from their teacher, so if the teacher allow their student to bring mobilephone it can disturb many student, for example if the phone was ringing in learning process, and it’s can make noise in the class room . It can disturb all of student end also teacher. Every student prohibit bring their mobile phone from their was kindergarden until their was in Senior High School. Althought the teacher allow their student bring their mobile phone, with give them a rules how using it in school area. But in fact, many student always break the rule, and using mobilephone at the learning process, and also its always make noise, and annoying for other student and teacher.

debate documented process :

1 komentar :